Project work
Task history, decisions and the person responsible.
- Original
- The task record written at the time.
- Current version
- The revision the project is working from.
- Allowed access
- People assigned to the project.
Technology
Give AI the context.
Keep work connected.
Useful AI needs more than a request. It needs the right company knowledge, tools to act, and a record of what changed. These are the foundations we are building into ATF Works.
Knowledge. Execution. Continuity.
Company Brain connects knowledge across the organization. The harness manages an individual task. Memory and file records preserve what the next task needs.
- Company Brain
- Shared knowledge
- Harness
- Task execution
- Memory
- Reviewed task context
- Files & knowledge
- Source files & history
Company knowledge, ready for the next task.
A decision in a meeting should not disappear into a folder. Company Brain is our shared knowledge foundation in development: connecting projects, decisions and documents while preserving their sources and access rules.
Meeting records
What was decided and what was left open.
- Original
- The meeting note as it was written.
- Current version
- The note after the agreed corrections.
- Allowed access
- Participants and the team that owns the topic.
Research records
Questions, conditions, observations and the original files.
- Original
- The referenced publication or measurement file.
- Current version
- The procedure currently approved for use.
- Allowed access
- The research team working on the subject.
Finished documents
The result, the material behind it and the questions still open.
- Original
- The approved document as delivered.
- Current version
- The revision the organization treats as current.
- Allowed access
- Readers granted by the owning team.
A plan the AI can actually work from.
The harness is the system that manages an AI task. It brings the goal, available tools, working context and completion criteria together, so execution has a defined starting point and a result to check.
The request
Compare sources and prepare an evidence-backed report.
Completion criteria
- Every claim points to a source.
- Say plainly what is still missing.
- Keep the reviewed report structure.
- 01
Set the goal
The request and its three completion criteria are recorded on the task.
What is checked
Define completion criteria before starting the task.
- 02
Search
A list of candidate material, each entry keeping its original link.
What is checked
Use material with traceable sources.
- 03
Draft
A report draft where each paragraph carries the material it relies on.
What is checked
Mark sentences that need supporting evidence.
- 04
Verify
A result for each completion criterion, plus the items still open.
What is checked
Completion is read from the output and the criteria, not from a message saying the work is done.
The desktop experience and full execution-and-evaluation loop are in development.
Remember what worked. Know what changed.
Memory keeps useful task context available for later work. A proposed update includes the previous text, new text and the reason for changing it. The broader company knowledge foundation is being developed separately.
Approved report structure
Previous record
Write the report as purpose, method, evidence, open questions.
This record
Write the report as purpose, method, evidence, open questions.
KeptWhy it changed
The same structure was reviewed and accepted, and this task has the same reader.
Source material
Review note on the previous report
“Keep this order. It is easy to review.”
How earlier measurements are used
Previous record
Reuse the measurements from the previous task in the conclusion.
This record
Do not use earlier measurements in a conclusion before the current material confirms them.
UpdatedWhy it changed
This task's material does not say when the earlier values were measured.
Source material
Input material list for this task
“Measurement date not recorded in the shared file.”
Length of the summary
Previous record
Keep the summary within five sentences.
This record
Keep the summary within five sentences, and list the evidence separately when there is more than one.
Applied, reversible while unchangedWhy it changed
The reviewer asked for the list of sources to stay visible in the summary.
Source material
Comment kept with the work record
“I could not tell how many sources the summary stood on.”
Memory proposals and change records are implemented. Reversal is available while the current text still matches the applied version. Automatic application depends on organization and profile settings.
Keep the source with the work.
A useful result should be possible to revisit. Personal and organization files have separate access scopes. Source text can be viewed and edited, with saved revisions kept apart from temporary execution files.
Trace a report back to its sources
Each sentence is paired with its source and any checks still needed.
Comparison report / draft
Source linked
Two of the compared methods were not measured under the same conditions.
Method comparison, original text
Source linked“Conditions differed between the two measurement sets.”
What this supports
The measurements used different conditions. This passage alone cannot establish which method performs better.
Source linked
This task uses the current input file as the reference for present conditions.
Input notes for this task
Source linked“Current file is the reference for this task.”
What this supports
The current input file is the reference for this task. It does not establish the conditions used in other tasks.
Further verification
Whether the difference holds over a longer period is not shown by the material at hand.
Longer-term evidence is needed
Further verificationThe example files describe the measurement conditions and the current input. They do not show whether the difference persists over time.
What to check next
Compare repeated measurements taken under the same conditions over a longer period, with the dates and method recorded.
How the draft handles it
Keep this sentence as an open question until the additional evidence has been reviewed.
File scopes, editing and revision history are implemented. General document-history restoration is not available today.
Better work starts with a better foundation.
Our next step is to connect work records, revised plans and evaluation into a complete improvement process. Explore this development direction, the research behind it, and how we plan to measure results.
How work improves