Probing Minimalist Phase Structure in LLMs: What Universal Dependencies Cannot Represent

Published
Source
arXiv
Paper number
246
Field
LLMs / NLP
arXiv ID
2605.26431

Key points

  • Use wh-movement stimuli designed so that UD tree distance remains invariant across conditions to detect structure beyond UD.
  • In 12 of 13 LLMs across four families, the authors find a distance slope proportional to Minimalist phase count, with βfin > βinf > 0.
  • Discover 13 out of 13 sign asymmetries that exactly match within-phase cohesion predictions, a result impossible to capture with UD-based probing.
  • Introduce canonical-layer reporting, which removes degrees of freedom from per-contrast peak reporting and applies a stricter standard.
  • Confirm the causal relevance of probe results with activation patching in 12 of 13 models.
  • The results suggest that distributional pretraining can induce formal syntactic representations that go beyond the limits of annotation-based probing.

Paper links

External research summaries. These are not HDATF publications or measured product results.

Read original (opens in a new tab)