When to Retrieve During Reasoning: Adaptive Retrieval for Large Reasoning Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv
- Paper number
- 168
- Field
- Agents / RAG / Reasoning
- arXiv ID
- 2604.26649
Key points
- Large reasoning models generate long chains of multi-step thought, but they still suffer from factual errors and higher hallucination rates when they need external knowledge.
- Traditional retrieval-augmented generation systems use a single pre-retrieval step, which fundamentally conflicts with the dynamic and unpredictable knowledge gaps that emerge during an LRM's multi-step reasoning.
- Existing iterative retrieval methods designed for standard LLMs are not compatible with LRMs because they use the wrong granularity, depend on internal signals unavailable in black-box models, or impose excessive efficiency costs on long reasoning chains.
- ReaLM-Retrieve, a reasoning-aware retrieval framework, formulates dynamic retrieval as a sequential decision problem and intervenes at the granularity of logical reasoning steps rather than tokens or sentences.
- It introduces Reasoning Step Uncertainty Score (RSUS), which combines verbalized uncertainty, entity-based entropy, and consistency signals to detect knowledge gaps and retrieval needs in a black-box compatible way.
- A retrieval intervention policy trained with REINFORCE dynamically decides when to search, constructs relevant queries, and integrates retrieved content efficiently with techniques such as implicit compression, speculative caching, and KV-cache preservation.
Paper links
External research summaries. These are not HDATF publications or measured product results.