DeepResearch RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Deep Research Report

Published
Source
arXiv
Paper number
1428
Field
Research
arXiv ID
2611.10156

Key points

  • The authors built the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating reward modeling for research reports.
  • Data collection kept only pairs with a score margin greater than 10/30 points to ensure discriminative challenge.
  • The evaluation covers 19 models spanning diverse architectures and scales from 7B to 235B parameters.
  • The evaluation encompasses 19 models spanning diverse architectures and scales from 7B to 235B parameters, categorized into three groups.
  • The initial inter-annotator agreement stood at 63%, improving to approximately 85% after discussion.
  • The authors expect the benchmark to serve as a testbed for research-oriented agents.

Paper links

External research summaries. These are not HDATF publications or measured product results.

Read original (opens in a new tab)