DynaHarness: A Dynamic Physical Harness for Self-Evolving Robot Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv
- Paper number
- 1160
- Field
- robotics
- arXiv ID
- 2609.40306
Key points
- Instead of treating a failure as 'the robot was bad', it localized which part (planning, execution, or recovery) went wrong and fixed only that part.
- It split the slow brain (planning) and the fast brain (monitoring) into two layers on different time scales, so ambiguous commands are refused and alternative actions are sought.
- Before a fix is admitted, it must pass regression checks, preventing the risk of breaking previously working functions while repairing.
- On 800 new LIBERO-Pro initial states it scored 75.2% versus 17.5% for the frozen policy, more than quadrupling performance with the harness alone and no retraining.
Paper links
External research summaries. These are not HDATF publications or measured product results.