DynaHarness: A Dynamic Physical Harness for Self-Evolving Robot Agents

Published
Source
arXiv
Paper number
1160
Field
robotics
arXiv ID
2609.40306

Key points

  • Instead of treating a failure as 'the robot was bad', it localized which part (planning, execution, or recovery) went wrong and fixed only that part.
  • It split the slow brain (planning) and the fast brain (monitoring) into two layers on different time scales, so ambiguous commands are refused and alternative actions are sought.
  • Before a fix is admitted, it must pass regression checks, preventing the risk of breaking previously working functions while repairing.
  • On 800 new LIBERO-Pro initial states it scored 75.2% versus 17.5% for the frozen policy, more than quadrupling performance with the harness alone and no retraining.

Paper links

External research summaries. These are not HDATF publications or measured product results.

Read original (opens in a new tab)