GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI

Published
Source
arXiv
Paper number
1128
Field
Agents
arXiv ID
2609.30147

Key points

  • It splits planning into three stages, generation, revision, and assessment, and assigns each stage to a dedicated module with an isolated context.
  • It gained about 12.4% higher accuracy on calendar scheduling and 30.8% on ZebraLogic puzzle reasoning compared to direct LLM planning.
  • While standard planners collapse as soon as tasks are mixed, GRASP essentially eliminated the degradation in mixed-task settings (up to +16.7%).
  • Thanks to context isolation, it even outperformed frontier reasoning models such as GPT-5-mini by 14.5% in some settings.

Paper links

External research summaries. These are not HDATF publications or measured product results.

Read original (opens in a new tab)