brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
- Source
- GitHub
- First trending
- Category
- Skills
- GitHub stars
- 3,949
- Main language
- Stata
This page introduces an external open-source repository. It is not an HDATF product.

What it does
A catalog of agent skills for empirical social-science research, spanning data cleaning through paper submission. Its README describes skill search by method, stage, language, and license, alongside evaluation and benchmark resources.
How it helps ATF
LabChin can reference research-stage skill organization and evaluation resources when structuring research workflows.
License
Custom license Custom or non-standard license. Read the license file before any reuse.
More in this category
- ChenLiu-1996/figures4papers
A collection of Python scripts for figures published at top AI conferences and journals, covering bar, radar, line, concept and trend plots, packaged with a scientific figure making skill and reference docs. - suyuan2022/suyuan-skill
A collection of Claude Code and Codex skills covering output refinement, independent code reviews, task triage, visual HTML explanations, and local cleanup audits. - davila7/claude-code-templates
A CLI and web catalog that installs ready made Claude Code components, including agents, commands, settings, hooks, MCP integrations and project templates, and also monitors Claude Code. - elvisun/newsjack
A collection of agent skills for public-relations work. The README describes news monitoring, topic and competitor searches, story-origin checks, relevance filtering, and triage of potential publicity opportunities. - ai-evals-course/evals-skills
A set of skills that guide AI coding agents through building product-specific evals, with an entry point skill that routes either to auditing an existing eval pipeline or to finding errors in unanalyzed traces.
Only repositories in the ranked Trendshift lists are included, and the lists are used only to find candidates. We do not copy their ranks. Descriptions, licenses and star counts come from each GitHub repository. The notes are our own reading. We have not tested these projects, and a place on a trending list does not prove quality.