Professional services / Technology consulting

Booz Allen Hamilton: Finding software exploit chains and preparing fixes with AI in security assessment work

Company
Booz Allen Hamilton
Country
United States
Adoption stage
Limited operation
Source published
Date basis
The date the source was published. It can differ from the date adoption started.
How the source was checked
Read the full source text

The work problem

According to an article Anthropic published on October 6, 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton's security assessments run for a fixed period, which limits how much source code, configuration and compiled software engineers can read before they end. Real attacks often work by chaining small weaknesses across code, configuration, identity and deployment settings, and tracing those connections by hand across a large software portfolio was slow even for a skilled operator.

Technology and data

Booz Allen used Claude Mythos Preview through Project Glasswing to review far more software than a short engagement window would normally allow and to identify weaknesses that could be strung together into attack paths. The model connects application behavior, configuration, identity, permissions and deployment context into security hypotheses, and drafts fixes and assembles evidence for the engineers who own the affected systems. Analysts handle validating findings, deduplicating them and deciding where to route them.

Results

According to the President of National Cybersecurity at Booz Allen, one analyst reviewed eight production systems across 138 repositories in twelve days, and a review at that scale without Mythos would have taken several months with a larger team. In one case, by following one setting through two different programs written in two different languages, the model found a flaw in which a security key, used by code that runs before the operating system loads to decide whether a device should lock itself or erase its data, had been left unprotected.

Limits and open questions

The clients assessed, the total number of findings and the share of incorrect findings are not in the source.

Sources

Compiled from public sources. These are not results from ATF Works customers.

Read original (opens in a new tab)